Sunday, November 06, 2011

Daily Digest November 4-5, 2011


The DAILY DIGEST: INFORMATION and OPINION from ST. JOHN'S to VICTORIA.
ARCHIVED at http://cdndailydigest.blogspot.com/


OPINION AND INFORMATION

_____CANADA
NOVEMBER 5TH
Veterans protest $226M in proposed cuts
Veterans across Canada staged protests on Saturday to rally against
$226 million in proposed budget clawbacks targeting Veterans Affairs.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2011/11/05/veterans-affairs-protest-cuts.html

CTV Ottawa: Military vets living on the streets
Homeless military veterans are living on Ottawa's streets as advocates gathered on Parliament Hill
to protest their treatment by the government. Karen Soloman reports.
http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/Canada/20111105/veterans-hold-protests-over-budget-cuts-111105/#ixzz1cssgngYm

Quebec Bosnia veteran launches hunger strike
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/story/2011/11/05/veteran-hunger-strike-depleted-uranium-contamination-cp.html

http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/Canada/20111105/pascal-lacoste-begins-hunger-strike-111105/#ixzz1css07uaN

NOVEMBER 4TH
Canada sheds 54,000 jobs in October
The Canadian economy unexpectedly shed 54,000 jobs last month, all in full time positions,
sending the country's jobless rate up two notches to 7.3 per cent.
MORE

Canada failing to nurture its farm potential

_____FOREIGN AFFAIRS

NOVEMBER 5TH


NOVEMBER 4TH
>>>>>>>>>>INFOS <<<<<<<<<<
SAMEDI 05 NOVEMBRE 2011
[]
VENDREDI 04 NOVEMBRE 2011
[]

BELOW(30)(30)(30)(30)(30)30)(30)(30)(30)(30)(30)30)(30)(30)(30)(30)(30)30)(30)(30)(30)(30)(30)(30)(30)(30)30)(30)(30)(30)(30)30)30)(30)(30)(30)(30)(30)(30)(30)

Veterans and Depleted Uranium
 
One veteran contends he was poisoned while serving in Bosnia in the 90's. He says a steady decline in his health began after he was exposed to depleted uranium. He also says Veterans Affairs Minister Steven Blaney and his department have denied his requests for decontamination treatments.

 Pascal Lacoste is not alone. Others as well believe radioactivity from depleted uranium they inhaled while in combat is continuing to cause for deterioration of their bodies.

"Depleted Uranium" http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/pubs/radiation/uranium-eng.php which is posted below in its summary states "Chemical toxicity of depleted uranium presents a greater risk than the radiological toxicity. " This conclusion is not universal as presented to you in the following a precis of  salient opinion expressed in "Gulf War Veterans and Depleted Uranium" http://www.ccnr.org/du_hague.html .

Veterans can identify situations in which they were likely to have been exposed to DU. Presence of depleted uranium in urine seven or eight years after exposure is sufficient evidence to substantiate long term internal contamination and tissue storage of this radioactive substance. Because of its slow absorption through the lungs and long retention in body tissues, its primary damage will be due to its radiological damage to internal organs rather than chemical damage to the renal system. However, with the lengthening of the time during which the contaminant resides in the body and the low overall dose, the risk of cancer death becomes greater than the risk of significant damage to the renal system.

Research has been continuing. "Date Modified: 2008-08-12". is the last modification of information provided by the Government of Canada. A means of scientifically determining the "Presence of depleted uranium in urine seven or eight years after exposure is sufficient evidence to substantiate long term internal contamination and tissue storage of this radioactive substance." has been developed

Watch this video "Depleted Uranium - The Ultimate Dirty Bomb " http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pg2NHfoC2pc .

Read this article which states "Despite pressure from veterans and their families, the Canadian government has only compensated two veterans for depleted uranium exposure, one posthumously." http://rabble.ca/news/2011/10/dying-be-remembered-poisoned-peacekeeper-considers-hunger-strike .

Then consider this question: Do you support testing of Pascal Lacoste and others by Veterans Affairs to validate the means of determining the degree and nature of radiation in the person tested for the Ministry?  A test that scientifically determines whether disability claims based on exposure to depleted uranium while in combat zones are valid or invalid

If so, let please let me know by e-mail and/or telephone.

        Joe
         905-356-3901
        Joe Hueglin <joe.hueglin@bellnet.ca>

Should you know someone affected by exposure who would benefit from the test, please put me in contact.

«¤»¥«¤»«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»
.


Depleted Uranium

http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/pubs/radiation/uranium-eng.php



What is depleted uranium?

Uranium occurs naturally and is approximately 40 times more abundant than silver. It consists of three isotopes: uranium-234, uranium-235 and uranium-238 which are present in amounts of 0.005%, 0.7%, and 99.3%, by weight, respectively.

While Canadian designed reactors (CANDU) use natural uranium and a heavy water moderator, reactors in most other countries are cooled and moderated by ordinary (light) water and require uranium enriched in the 235-isotope. The proportion of uranium-235 is typically increased from 0.7% to between 3% and 5%. The enrichment process also increases the percent of uranium-234.

Depleted uranium is a byproduct of the enrichment process. The amounts of uranium-234 and uranium-235 remaining in depleted uranium metal are about 0.002% and 0.2%, respectively. The effect of removing these isotopes is that depleted uranium is about 40% less radioactive than natural uranium. For comparison, it is 10 million times less radioactive gram for gram than Americium-241 which is found in domestic smoke detectors.





What is depleted uranium used for?

Due to its high density (1.7 times the density of lead) and relative availability, depleted uranium is well suited for use as counterweights in aeroplanes, yachts and professional race cars, and as radiation shields for medical radiotherapy units and transportation of radioactive isotopes. Military applications include heavy tank armour, anti-tank missiles and projectiles. Depleted uranium weapons are regarded as conventional weapons and as such were widely used in the 1990 Gulf War (290 tonnes), 1994/95 in Bosnia and 1999 in Kosovo (10 tonnes). The Canadian Forces have recently replaced depleted uranium rounds in its Naval Close-In-Weapons System (CIWS) with tungsten rounds.





How could depleted uranium get into the human body?

When a depleted uranium projectile strikes a target, the uranium usually burns. Combustion will also occur if any projectile strikes depleted uranium shielding or if an aircraft carrying depleted uranium crashes. The burning of depleted uranium produces dust and oxide aerosols which can be inhaled directly or ingested in contaminated food, drinking water or soil. For depleted uranium intake, inhalation is the dominant route of short term or acute exposure in occupational settings. Ingestion is the major source of long term or chronic intake to the general public.





How would an intake of depleted uranium be detected?

Because uranium is ubiquitous throughout the natural environment, approximately 90 :g of uranium, on average, exists in the human body from normal daily intakes of air, water and food. The biological distribution is approximately 66% in the skeleton, 16% in liver, 8% in kidneys and 10% in other tissues. Due to the presence of natural uranium, a suspected intake of depleted uranium cannot be confirmed by techniques which measure total uranium or uranium-238 only. Depleted uranium is detected by measuring relative amounts of the isotopes on samples such as urine or hair, or on a person in a whole-body counter. Thermal Ionisation Mass Spectrometry (TIMS) or Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP/MS) measurements on urine or hair are approximately a million times more sensitive than whole body counting techniques.





What are the hazards?

Depleted uranium presents both a radiological and chemical risk to health. The level of risk depends on the route of exposure and the solubility.





Radiological Hazard

As noted above, depleted uranium is 40% less radioactive than natural uranium. The most hazardous route of exposure from radiological point of view is inhalation, followed by ingestion and external exposure. The radiological risk can be understood by estimating the amount of depleted uranium that would deliver a dose equal to 1 millisievert in one year, the public dose limit for releases from regulated facilities in Canada. For comparison, the dose received from natural background radiation in Canada is about 2 millisievert per year. (A millisievert is the unit for effective dose of ionizing radiation. This dose is considered to be directly related to health risk.)





Some examples which put the radiological risk into perspective:

  • Insoluble depleted uranium is considered the most hazardous form for inhalation as it remains in the lungs. A dose of 1 millisievert would be received from inhaling 8 milligrams of insoluble depleted uranium.
  • Soluble depleted uranium is the most hazardous form for ingestion as it is absorbed into the body. A dose of 1 millisievert would be received from ingesting about 1400 milligrams of soluble depleted uranium. This route of exposure presents only a small fraction of the potential radiological risk of inhalation for the same amount of intake. The relative radiological risks for ingestion and inhalation are 1:200, if the depleted uranium contains equal amounts of soluble and insoluble forms.
  • External exposure to depleted uranium presents the least hazard. A person could be completely surrounded by depleted uranium 24 hours a day for a week before receiving a 1 millisievert dose.





Chemical Toxicity

The chemical toxicity of depleted uranium is the same as that of natural uranium. Uranium is a heavy metal with similar health effects to lead, cadmium, nickel, cobalt, and tungsten. The kidney is the organ primarily affected and soluble uranium presents the greatest hazard. Studies of animals have shown observable changes in kidney tissue at daily intakes by ingestion equivalent to 4.2 milligrams per day for a person.
  • One study of a population with high uranium in drinking water found small but observable changes in kidney function at chronic daily intakes of about 0.05 milligrams per day.
  • Equivalent studies of the risks of inhalation have not been conducted. However, using models it can be estimated that acute inhalation of 0.6 milligrams of moderately soluble depleted uranium would result in approximately the same risk to the kidney as chronic ingestion of 0.05 milligrams per day for 90 days.
  • There is no chemical toxicity associated with external exposure to depleted uranium.

For comparison, at background concentrations of uranium dust in air, an average person would inhale about 0.004 milligrams of uranium in one year. The intake of natural uranium in water and food averages about 0.002 milligrams/day or 0.7 milligrams/year.





Summary

Chemical toxicity of depleted uranium presents a greater risk than the radiological toxicity. As an example, observable changes in kidney function could result from consuming uranium at 0.05 milligrams/day, or about 20 milligrams/year, in drinking water. The radiation dose from the ingestion of this amount of uranium is less than 1% of that from natural background radiation in Canada. One would not expect to observe any radiological effects from the ingestion of this much uranium. For the same chemical burden to the kidney, the equivalent uranium amount of acute inhalation is 0.6 milligrams of moderately soluble depleted uranium. This would produce a radiation dose of 0.015 millisievert, which is again insignificant compared to a possible chemical effect. For a given amount of uranium intake, whether through either ingestion or inhalation, chemical toxicity of depleted uranium is more significant than its radiological toxicity.




References

  1. Atomic Energy Control Board, A Canada: Living with Radiation@, 1995.
  2. Health Canada, A Uranium in Drinking Water, Public Document for Comment@, 1999.
  3. Limson Zamora, M., Tracy, B.L., Zielinski, J.M., Meyerhof, D.P. and Moss, M.A. Chronic Ingestion of Uranium in Drinking Water: A Study of Kidney Bioeffects in Humans, Toxicological Sciences, 43:68-77, 1998.
  4. Gilman, A.P., Villeneuve, D.C., Secours, V.E., Yagminas, A.P., Tracy, B.L., Quinn, J.M., Valli, V.E., Willes, R.J. and Moss, M.A. (1998a) Uranyl nitrate: 28-day and 91-day toxicity studies in the Sprague-Dawley rat. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol., 41: 117B128.
  5. Merril Eisenbud, A Environmental Radioactivity@ , 2nd Edition, Academic Press, New York (1973).
  6. World Health Organisation, A Depleted Uranium - Sources, Exposure and Health Effects@, Geneva (April 2001).

Date Modified: 2008-08-12

===================================