Topics mostly from the Canadian Press & comments received from the General Public. Canadian news is the prime perspective, by Canada Newspapers with views on how Canada sees the rest of the world. To comment on the topics or on the comments themselves, one can forward email HERE. Site allows communication to a world wide audience.
Hits from January 19, 2007
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The "latest in Canadian politics" has nothing (or virtually nothing) to do with Canada or the vast majority of Canadians.
It has to do with Conservative Members of Parliament using tax paid mailings to target ridings in which a strategy is being played out. The strategy, switching voters from being Liberals to supporting the CPC by comparing themselves as supportive, the Libs as anything but.
"Normal morality is often suspended in extreme circumstances." is a definition of the saying ""All is fair in love and politics".
What are the "extreme circumstances" making such a measure necessary?
How does this action relate to the slogan"STAND UP FOR CANADA"?
One last thing, just how does believing (based on empirical evidence) that the Israeli Defence Force went too far in Operation Cast Iron lead to the accusation a person is anti-semitic?
Kelly McParland argues that politics should never trump the law, but I wonder if he means only when authorities deal with natives. McParland is no doubt aware that Canada is a signatory to the Convention on Torture and is obliged to arrest anyone credibly accused of violating its provisions. I look forward to his call next time George W. Bush ventures onto Canadian territory.
This is an excerpt from QP yesterday wherein the CPC states if finds the theft of land from Palestinians(settlement expansion) by israel 'unhelpful'!!!. Not criminal or an act of war, but 'unhelpful'??
After reading the G&M article posted on the DD(also posted on Rense) I cannot contain my disgust for our government and a country that cannot call this action criminal. We are killing and being killed in Afghanistan to 'bring them democracy' and yet we condone these actions by Israel against the Palestinians??? How can our government pretend there is a 'peace process' ongoing when things like this happen and they don't have the courage to say NO???
Becky
=================================== From: "Mahmood Elahi" To: "Letters \(ott\)" <letters@thecitizen.canwest.com> Subject: "Buy American" will not save American jobs
The Editor The Ottawa Citizen
"By American" will not save American jobs
Re Letter: "U.S. protectionism grounds the shopper," by Ken Herbert (Nov. 17).
Few months ago, I bought a laptop computer from Hewlett-Packard --- an American company --- marked "Product of China." How can a product of an American company end up as a "Product of China?" Clearly, it is the outcome of so-called outsourcing because cheap Chinese labour makes it possible for these American companies to multiply their profits while laying off well-paid American workers at home.
The logic behind this has been that international divisions of labour allow labour-intensive industries to be located in countries where labour is abundant and capital-intensive high-tech jobs in countries with well-paid skilled labour. But with the growing outsourcing of high-tech industries like computers and consumer electronics to China, the companies have found a place where they can outsource even high-tech industries while paying low-tech wages. This is why HP laptop computers bear the mark: "Product of China."
The results have been not only job losses in the United States, but also growing U.S. trade deficits vis a vis China. In fact, China is bankrolling America's trade and budget deficits. China is now lending the Americans to buy the American products made in China, creating jobs in China and allowing the American corporations multiply their profits.
This is why "Buy American" policy will not save jobs in America. If the United States is serious about saving American jobs, it should treat those companies that outsource production as foreign companies for tax pupose. China taxes heavily foreign companies because it knows these companies will flock to China to take advantage of China's huge skilled and low-paid workforce. The United States should also treat these companies as foreign companies and tax them accordingly. This will force them to maintain two operations -- one in China for the Chinese consumers and one in the United States for the American consumers. "Buy American" policy is counterproductive as there are so few things made in America to buy.
MAHMOOD ELAHI Ottawa
=================================== From: Ray Strachan Subject: Fwd: Vietnam, Afghanistan etc.
Wars of Attrition.
It is often said that guerrilla warfare is primitive.
This generalization is misleading and true only in the technical sense.
Guerrilla war is not dependent for success on the efficient operation
of complex mechanical devices,highly organized logisticalo systems ,
or the accuracy of electronic computers.
It can be conducted in any terrain,in any climate,in any weather, in swamps,in
mountains,in fields.
Its basic element is man,and man is more complex than any of his machines.
He is endowed with intelligence,emotions and will.
Guerrilla warfare is therefore suffused with,and reflects,mans admirable
qualities as well as his less pleasant ones.
While it is not always humane,it is human,which is more than can be said
This seems to be the wrong way for our Tories to reach a majority. Financially it may be a benefit, however in all reality there may be three negative votes for the one that is added.
Association at times does not always produce the desired results. Canada is ranked No. 1 in a new world popularity poll that looked at attitudes toward 12 major nations. Israel received the worst rating of the group.
John Halonen
=================================== From: "John Feldsted" Subject: Afghan detainees surrendered by Canada were tortured: Envoy
What a load of absolute rubbish! NATO troops are in Afghanistan to remove the Taliban, not to take over and run the nation. Canadian soldiers who capture Afghans in their efforts to fulfill the NATO mandate must turn over captured Afghans to local authorities. They are not there to baby-sit captured combatants.
What the Afghans did or do with captured combatants is none of our business. If Richard Colvin has a problem with Afghan authorities he can take it up with them. Trying to make Canada's military responsible for civilian Afghan actions is reprehensible.
Colvin should be before a Commons Committee to answer for his allegations and then tried for treason.
A recent analysis by Montreal's Le Devoir found Tory MPs have spent $6.3 million to paper ridings with the brochures.
Liberal MP Bob Rae said parliamentarians should reconsider whether such pamphlets - symptomatic of what he called "a new kind of gutter politics" - are the best use of taxpayers' money. He favours banning MPs from sending mass mailings to voters outside their own ridings http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/capress/091118/national/liberals_tories_jewish
Any opinions on banning mailings outside M.P.'s own ridfings or allowing what has become current practice to continue?
From: Rebecca Gingrich Subject: foreign ownership and the airwaves
Joe--if companies believed in competition they wouldn't be concerned about other companies moving in. I do not like foreign ownership of Canadian institutions like the HBC etc. but our government saw nothing wrong with that, did they? I noticed you slipped the CWB in as an example. The CWB is only similar in that farmers have to sell through the CWB whether they want to or not. I care not who is on the board--the fact that farmers are not free to sell their product privately in a democracy is reprehensible. And don't forget that Cargill is the biggest customer of the CWB so who do you think calls the shots for the CWB? This is the same mentality that controls the CRTC. They decide what services we can have. They agree to raise prices for the companies that ask for it, and even have us paying for the CBC which is against all things we are supposed to be in a free market country. The only thing that talks in any of these so called discussions is money--something the peons don't have, so the CRTC will only decide in favour of whoever has the most money and clout.
If our costs are increased by one red cent I will cancel my cable and not watch TV. There is really nothing on that is worth watching anyway. This circus is nothing more than the companies trying to get more money from the taxpayer or the user. Maybe without any onf them we wil actually start using our brains instead of being fed pablum?
Becky
=================================== From: The Natroses
Hi Joe, "Time to reel in phoney fish sales" is timely. http://www.edmontonjournal.com/opinion/editorials/Time+reel+phoney+fish+sales/2225465/story.html Besides having a laugh, it is pretty sad to think that the only way to get the attention of a mainlander is at their stomach. The article solution is simple but foolhardy. "Other jurisdictions, particularly in the U.S. and Europe, have been cracking down on this global phenom and it's about time federal and provincial inspectors, not to mention retailers, begin to protect us from this nonsense." It has been going on for years with the 'big guys', the deceptive practice of replacing high price fish with a cheaper fish product. The big guys are getting away with this, in Canada because the smaller independent fishermen, or small fish processor are not allow to ship or sell product outside the province. For example, a few fishermen found a market inside Toronto, that wanted fresh fish. The fishermen have the means of transporting the fish to the big T.O. , they agree on a price that is much more favourable than anything in the province, and everyone is happy. The reality is the small independent fishermen are force to sell its caught product to the processors (which in most cases are the big guys), at a per-determine price, that is influence heavily by a panel that is made up of government and the big guys. This is one of the many reasons, that our fishery is in crisis. Our small independent fishermen cannot look to other markets outside the province, and so the big guys take advantage of the fact, that most outside the fishery industry does not have the knowledge and be able to tell the difference between cod, halibut and other fish species. If Small independent fishermen are allow to seek out their own markets, the likelihood of switching would not happen as much, if at all; since it would be a dear price to pay. The loss of income and a market. It does not happen with the big guys, because of how the fish market is set up. There is no regulations regarding where the fish was caught, if farmed, what country, and so forth. So, a cod caught in the Pacific, could be a cod that was marketed as a cod from the North Atlantic. There is a taste difference, but most would not know what to look for. At least with an independent, the buyer would get a little bit of old-fashioned service with a smile, and a much better price. You see the big guys also operate and manage the supply and prices of seafood. Their motto is, the lowest price for raw product and the highest retail price that the market can bare. If anyone is eating cod tonight in the mainland, and if the cod was caught in Newfoundland waters; be aware what the big guy paid the fishermen, the top dollar of fifty cents a pound. Now tell me, what is the latest price of cod at the retail counter? I bet it is dear, compare to other fish.
Hi Joe, Another topic on education, but this time on education in India. My interest was pique, when reading the Star's articles on dowries, than a news item where it was stated, that most slum kids of India do not go to school.
A question that I have, why are countries like India - an economic powerhouse and democratic country, are not pressured by the world to improve their education system. Why are we outsourcing jobs to India, when only 33 % of the student population actually receives an education? ÂIndia spends 3.3 % of their GNP, to education. The main bulk of education spending, takes place at the high school level and beyond. For many children, they do not qualify to obtain a high school education or beyond because most of them are illiterate.
Below is a list on links for readers to see for themselves.
The next time I am on the phone, and by chance I am talking to some Indian person at a call centre, I will be asking a lot of questions on the caste system, and everything else on India cultural practices that prevents the large bulk of their population from receiving an education. I really resent outsourcing jobs to countries to economic powerhouses, where little or none of their wealth goes to education of ALL their people.
=================================== From: "Raymond Denson" Subject: Armaments and War
At this season of sad remembrance it is pertinent to recall that, after the Battle of the Somme in 1916, the German government offered peace terms which were hastily and summarily rejected by the British prime minister, David Lloyd George. The proposed terms included withdrawal to the pre-1914 frontiers of Germany and were so embarrassingly generous that they had to be concealed from the British public. Britain fought on until Germany collapsed in chaos and the number of British dead approached one million. The major beneficiaries of this holocaust, like those of the current conflict, were the manufacturers of armaments, who were suspected of doing all they could to prolong the hostilities. This brings me to a consideration of 9/11. Who have been the principal beneficiaries? Certainly not the Moslems, who have died in tens and hundreds of thousands. Is it naive to believe that those who stood to benefit most from 9/11 had a hand in bringing it about?
Raymond Denson
=================================== From: Immanuel Giulea Subject: December 7 event in Ottawa - for your distribution list
Hello Joe,
Could you forward the details below to your distribution list, it has the full details of my Ottawa event, the panel discussion organized by the Société Macdonald-Cartier Society. Here are the full details, if you would please send this to your list as well, it would be very appreciated.
- Title of the event The conservative movement at a crossroads: Lessons from the past, directions for the future Looking back on the last six years, looking ahead for next six. Four speakers reflect on the past, present and future of the conservative movement in Canada.
- Name of sponsoring organization Société MacDonald-Cartier Society
Panel speakers and short bio: - Gerry Nicholls Former Senior Executive with the National Citizens Coalition and publisher of LibertasPost.ca) - John Robson Radio commentator and Ottawa Citizen columnist - Joseph C. Ben-Ami President of the Canadian Centre for Policy Studies - Don Lenihan Ph.D. Vice President, Engagement - Public Policy Forum
Moderator - Waller R. Newell, Ph.D. Professor of Political Science and Philosophy and co-director of the Centre for Liberal Education and Public Affairs at Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada
- Time and location December 7 2009, 6 to 9pm Parliament Pub, 101 Sparks St (There is also an entrance on Wellington St)
For more information and RSVP please contact Immanuel Giulea, Executive Director of Société Macdonald-Cartier Society at macdonaldcartier@gmail.com or 514-577-2669
=================================== From: "Paul Downie" Subject: Info on H1N1
Dr. Vinay Goyal is an MBBS,DRM,DNB (Intensivist and Thyroid specialist), having clinical experience of over 20 years. He has worked in institutions like Hinduja Hospital, Bombay Hospital, Saifee Hospital, Tata Memorial, etc. Presently, he is heading our Nuclear Medicine Department and Thyroid clinic at Riddhivinayak Cardiac and Critical Centre, Malad (W).
The following message given by him; I feel it makes a lot of sense and is important for all to know.
"The only portals of entry are the nostrils and mouth/throat. In a global epidemic of this nature, it's almost impossible not coming into contact with H1N1 in spite of all precautions. Contact with H1N1 is not so much of a problem as proliferation is.
While you are still healthy and not showing any symptoms of H1N1 infection, in order to prevent proliferation, aggravation of symptoms and development of secondary infections, some very simple steps, not fully highlighted in most official communications, can be practiced (instead of focusing on how to stock N95 or Tamiflu):
1. Frequent hand-washing (well highlighted in all official communications).
2. "Hands-off-the-face" approach. Resist all temptations to touch any part of face.
3. *Gargle twice a day with warm salt water (use Listerine if you don't trust salt). *H1N1 takes 2-3 days after initial infection in the throat/nasal cavity to proliferate and show characteristic symptoms. Simple gargling prevents proliferation. In a way, gargling with salt water has the same effect on a healthy individual that Tamiflu has on an infected one. Don't underestimate this simple, inexpensive and powerful preventative method.
4. Similar to 3 above, *clean your nostrils at least once every day with warm salt water. *Not everybody may be good at using a Neti pot, but *blowing the nose hard once a day and swabbing both nostrils with cotton swabs dipped in warm salt water is very effective in bringing down viral population.*
5. *Boost your natural immunity with foods that are rich in Vitamin C. *If you have to supplement with Vitamin C tablets, make sure that it also has Zinc to boost absorption.
6. *Drink as much of warm liquids (tea, coffee, etc) as you can. *Drinking warm liquids has the same effect as gargling, but in the reverse direction. They wash off proliferating viruses from the throat into the stomach where they cannot survive, proliferate or do any harm.
I suggest you pass this on to your entire e-list; you never know who might pay attention to it - and STAY ALIVE because of it - =================================== From: "Phyllis Hubeli" Subject: Re: DD
I totally agree with you, Becky. It is high time MPs began to vote in the best interest of their constituents instead of in the best interest or current whim of the PM. It is also time that the media get the message, put their brain back in action and instead of finding an MP who actually does vote in the best interest of his/her constituents "despicable". feels it is high time those MPs who do are applauded in print, on TV and radio. Let's have a democracy in actual fact rather than the myth of democracy that exists in this country today.
Phyllis
=================================== From: Joseph <joseph@commonground.ca> Subject: Harper's visit to Mombai is selling Atomic Bombai as "civilian nuclear technology" CBC
heard a news clip on CBC the other day about Prime Minister Harper's visit in India, Mombai .
the clip made me cringe
they said PM was over there to open more trade .... then they said he was promoting the sale of Canadian civilian nuclear technology
interesting the news release that CBC sourced from had the term "civilian nuclear technology" I guess they are sensitive to this issue of atomic bomb and had included the term "civilian nuclear technology"
as different and distinct from , what would you call it, non-civilian nuclear technology, or atomic bomb civilian nuclear technology, or military technology because you can do it all with our Candu atomic reactor technology.
But, for example, when you sell a sledge hammer to a customer you can't really check up on every thing they use the hammer for, can you now?
So this term just slipped by like a silent fart "civilian nuclear technology", as if there would be no problems because it is labeled nice civil civilian nuclear technology.
Remember that Canada sold India a NRX research "civilian nuclear technology" that helped them produce and explode their first atomic bomb, but that was ok I guess if India called it a safe peaceful "civilian nuclear technology" test.
We need to watch the weasel words that the sellers of atomic reactors and their front men are using.
We need to hold to account these political promoters when the deceive the news reporters and the public.
Joseph
PS Harper's visit to Mombai is selling Atomic Bombai.
=================================== From: Rebecca Gingrich Subject: The truth dare not be spoken?
=================================== From: Larry Kazdan To: torsun.editor@sunmedia.ca Subject: Letter to Editor re: European battlefield foes discover friendship in peace, Eric Margolis, 15th November 2009
Re: European battlefield foes discover friendship in peace, Eric Margolis, 15th November 2009
France and Germany were able to transcend decades of enmity by enmeshing themselves in European-wide political institutions. For example, Europe now has a directly-elected Parliament where members organize not along national but according to party views. This European Parliament began as an advisory body some 57 years ago and helped countries develop trust and overcome constitutional logjams. The United Nations could learn from the EU experience. Establishing a consultative United Nations Parliamentary Assembly under Charter Article 22 would give the world a symbol of unity, a conscience to do the right things (such as fulfill the Millennium Development Goals), and provide a lever for further democratic UN reform. Europe has learned that there are better ways to make decisions than having catastrophic wars - a lesson the world community must heed and must institutionalize if we are to survive.
_____________________________ To: Letters@globeandmail.com Subject: Letter to Editor re: B.C. paramedics back to work after weekend of disarray, Nov 16, 2009
Re: B.C. paramedics back to work after weekend of disarray, Nov 16, 2009
Health Minister Kevin Falcon accuses paramedics of putting people's lives at risk over labour issues. This from the same B.C. Liberal Government that deregulated child labour rules in 2003 to allow children under age 15 to work outside the home in fields such as construction. Since that legislation was implemented, there has been a dramatic increase in work-related injuries to children aged 12-14. If the Health Minister is truly concerned with the safety of vulnerable people in our province, then stop using young people as cheap labour.
Larry Kazdan,
Vancouver, B.C.
=================================== From: Joseph <joseph@commonground.ca>
=================================== From: Ray Strachan Subject: If I Knew
If I knew something that was useful to me,but it would hurt my family,I would evict it from my thoughts. If I knew something useful to my family,but not to my nation,I would try to forget it. If I knew something useful to my country,but harmfull to the human species, I would consider it a crime.
tThere are those who have concern for the continuing loss of decision making to non-Canadians - there are those to whom this is no concern. The market should be open. Capital and management should be in the hands of the successfull with no restrictions .
Cabinet will short6ly make a choice between the views of Industry Canada and the CRTC. as developed below.
Which choice would you make if you were at the table and what would be your arguments to other Ministers?
__________________________________________________________ Should Cabinet welcome Globalive intto the Canadian market?
"Will the Cabinet follow the rule of law or not? " is the question. Which will take precedence, Canadian ownership of critical institutions or increasing competition through globalization?
Stelco, Inco and Nortel are no longer Canadian owned. Despite western farmers twice voting four our of five directors into office favouring continuance of the Canadian Wheat Board single desk marketing of the grain, this has not been accepted.
Cabinet overriding the CRTC would effectively circumvent the foreign ownership rule. It would open wide wireless communication to foreign ownership. Ought such a change in direction be considered by Cabinet without an Act of Parliament?
Might Cabinet choosing to follow Industry Canada's view rather than that of the CRTC and permitting Globalive Wireless Management Corp to enter the market add an issue to the election when it comes?
To: Publisher comments Subject: Publisher comments
Publisher is Alan Heisey, 38 Avoca Avenue, L.P.H #6, Toronto, ON, Canada, M4T 2B9 Phone 416 923 5381, 705 756 3289, <hize@earthlink.net> Emailed from Naples, FL.
Publisher comments
The publisher reminds readers that he welcomes your assistance in growing this current email list of some 1,400 conservative-minded people in the city, province and country. Please forward names of activists, preferably with eda of residence, and email address and all will receive an opening page which shows how to promptly be removed from this mailing list! Would be pleased to identify you as the introducer but only if you wish!cz
Publisher comments Open letter to party interim president: candidate data, please!
This reporter is delighted that the votes by the eleven Nova Scotia constituency presidents for the party's new national councillor from Nova Scotia were fully reported on the national party's web site shortly thereafter. I address the details of this breakthrough from traditional secrecy about elections within the party structure in detail in the next '"worm" headline:
More important, however, is the desirable precedent for parallel, full information about other coincident elections for the national council. And this breakthrough in transparency lead me to recently write an open emailed letter, (after phone notice that it was being sent,) to our interim national president, Kara Johnson, and to the national council members, insofar as I know who they are. Even though only e.d.a. presidents participate in elections for the various provincial candidates for the constitution and policy committees, I plain would like to know who are the declared candidates for each of the slots, their c.v.s, and any platforms they may bring to their runs for office. Hence this email:
kara, may party headquarters keep up the good work! an open letter from alan heisey to be published in next sunday's edition of ""worm".cz 09 11 10 i confirm my phone message to you on the weekend. i begin by extending my congratulations on your assisting our party's good works by carrying out the responsibilities of interim president!
one of the gta watchers of headquarters and the national party web site is doug hawkins. he told me recently about the big leap forward in terms of the openness of party processes in the election results for a new councillor for nova scotia. i think the full reporting of the voting preferences of the presidents participating is such dramatic progress that i will include a separate item about it in the next issue of '"worm" and about my conversation with a nova scotia eda president. i even think it should have been page one news on the party's web site! but as a lay member of the national party who does not watch our web site very often, preoccupied as it's front page is with the national parliament, i write to ask if it would be possible for the national party's membership at large to be kept informed of the declared candidates for the upcoming election of the presidency of the party, and also for parallel advance information, as well as detailed results for the other national council positions which i assume were filled at the same time as nova scotia's.
i am particularly interested, as well, in knowing who are declared candidates from ontario for the four positions yet to be elected, as i understand it, for the policy and constitution committees. while i amentirely supportive of the methods of election by eda presidents from ontario for the ontario slots, i think knowing, as they declare, who has declared, would materially assist in seeing candidates elected who share my - and others' - values and priorities - to whatever extent they may choose to advise the party laity of their positions on assorted party processes and issues. i think for example, you are aware of my views that ontario's population alone should justify the addition of a fifth councillor and counterparts in the national council and the two designated committees. I also strongly favour the division of the province into five regions of equal population so that each candidate is responsible to a particular and unique region and the comparative powerlessness of all being elected at large from across our entire population is overcome. as a courtesy to other members, and recent members, of the national council, to the extent that i have their names and email addresses at hand i forward them all a copy of this letter as i email it to you.
because i think the election of a new, salaried national president for our party should be the subject of substantial public interest and awareness, even though restricted by our current constitution to being the chosen decision of only a comparative small number of national councillors, i also forward copies of this letter to the four toronto dailies and to the cbc. respectfully submitted, (as always) ! cordially,
The sole response to the email was the following rejoinder from Menno Froese, national council regional vp west and councillor for British Columbia:
I am very disappointed that you feel necessary to discuss internal Party organization and improvements with non-members and non-supporters. That does little to encourage more openness and transparency, my friend!
To which I replied: m, thank you for writing. my view is that our party functions in a public way for the public purpose. i favour lively public discussion of our party organization and improvements since i think it builds awareness, confidence and participation. honourable differences between you and me. cordially, alan heisey
Our party's web site report of Nova Scotia councillor votes
What follows is apparently a direct, if somewhat cryptic, "lift" from the national party's web site of results of the election by eleven Nova Scotia e.d.a. presidents for the Nova Scotia councillor position made vacant by the election of the former councillor to the senate. "Name Electoral District Richard Clark Cameron MacKeen Hugh Roddis Bill Morris Dartmouth/Cole Harbour 3 1 2 Sonja Lifford West Nova 2 3 1 Paula Henderson Halifax West 3 2 1 Jeffrey R. Hunt Cumberland Colchester Musquodoboit Valley 3 1 2 Todd Graham Sydney Victoria 3 1 2 Chris Lydon Halifax 2 1 3 Sandra Richards South Shore St. Margaret's 1 3 2 Bud Baker Sackville Eastern Shore 3 1 2 Herman McLellan Kings-Hants 3 2 1 Donald P. MacNeil Cape Breton Canso 2 1 3 Peter Kay Central Nova 3 1 2" In a littlemore generous use of web space itmight have beenmade clearer that the first line consists of the name of the eda president who voted, the name of the electoral district and each president's choices, first, second or third for the three candidates, Clark, MacKeen and Roddis. Left to your own devices you will quickly recognize that low vote total wins, namely Cameron MacKeen!
I checked the Elections Canadawebsites for each of these ridings and found that they listed a different name as the president (or chief executive officer, how grand!) for the first, third, sixth, eighth and ninth of the 11 ridings! I thought this indicated slovenlyness somewhere, either edas not bothering to update their Elections Canada listings or the minister responsible not keeping the heat on for accurtate listings by all parties in all districts, or possibly some other reasons!
Also phoned Peter Kay, last president on the list for a little perspective. He said the winning candidate visited the other presidents, whereas the others phoned, also that his understanding was that the voting process and publicizing came from Ottawa and seemed satisfactory to his fellow presidents. I am hugely impressed by this detailed, party, electoral reporting, since in my own case, as a still-would-be member of my own St. Paul's federal board I like the idea that win or lose I have a right to know the number of votes I might achieve compared to other of the candidates for the board. Further, I like, no love ,the idea, that there should be contests for the presidency in most board selection processes and that the winners and losers and all involved would know exactly the total votes for each candidate. Carry this exact concept on to the upcoming election of a new president, yawn, for the national council. There are said to be several councillors declared for the top slot and how desirable it is that all party members know in advance who they are, and then exactly how they and others did in the comparatively small circle's voting so that plans for future "initiatives" could be better based on known, public bases.
Of course the presidency of our national party used to be a powerful position with elections at large across the delegates at national meetings. The then successful candidate had a substantial standing in party and public affairs when he or she could resolutely represent the interests of what I jestingly call "the laity", the amateurs, faced up on those few necessary occasions against the professionals, the leader, (gasp!) the inner and outer cabinet circles, the backbenchers but still elected M.P.s, and the awsome, layered apparatchiks of the PMO!
Year-end events to come, and gone forever, apparently
For whatever reason this year I have not sent my sometimes substantial annual contribution to the national party's coffers.Withmy local federal association husbanding (and spending so very little) some $140K in the bank, I felt no pressure, nor pleasure there, though I did send Sue-Ann Levy's provincial campaign a coupla hundred. Thus I do not realistically expect to receive a copy of the national leader's annual calendar, replete with endless perspectives of hizzoner on theworld, national and local stages. sometimeswith lieutenants identified, rarely with us spear carriers, in moments of reflection.
I still hope that some h.q. flak can penetrate the page one mentality of our partyweb site with endless pictures of the leader as the party and the party as leader, and me unpersuaded by it all. I make the case, again, for the January, 2010 calendar page to be Joe Lunchbucket and Mrs. in their kitchen, with the weeks's groceries still bagged and our national first minister just happening to knock at the backdoor.....
Other year-end event apparently gone forever was the Toronto annual December Sunday brunch out by the airport with lots of federal and provincial and municipal mucky mucks and national costumes and hundreds in attendance. That event, run on for literally a quarter century, coincided with us winning chunks of local federal and provincial seats, but nowthere is no federal party structure stringing together the 23 T.O. seats, beside one younger organizer, holding the fort!
Reflecting on that loss of occasion I pulled back into the subsconcious a variation of a St. Paul's families' winter luncheon on the Saturday between Xmas and NewYears under the St. Clair bridge, with charcoal braziers and each group required to sing one verse of a favorite song - possibly with the grits and crats on the other side of the same creek, hurtling campaign signs or jollies at the other guys! No?? Your turn!